According to the complaint of induction, experimental justification doesn’t indispensably lead to truth. For e.g. there is positively the outrageous volume of experimental justification which swans have been regularly white in Gothic Europe until the Europeans went to Australia as well as detected black swans. So initiation logic led to the wrong end in this case.
Now my subject is what if the laws of production were to shift unexpected a single day notwithstanding before experimental evidence. What if the arrogance of wholeness in scholarship is wrong? Would you all die?
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
It takes some hardcore facts to make a law. Even more to change a scientific law. We all wouldn’t die if the scientific law were to change. If it were wrong, and we have been living all this time since it was proposed, there’s no reason for any death caused by its change. If the scientific law does change, it probably won’t happen in our lifetime. Don’t worry about it, sip some tea, and lay back.
You do not want that to happen. Trust me.
The fact that the scientific method doesn’t lead to “Truth” with a capital T is its strong suit. Anyone who claims to have the unassailable Truth is selling you something.