Our existing laws seem to work well except for the Mexican border so why talk about new comprehensive?

Our existent laws appear to work good solely for the Mexican border, so because speak about brand new “comprehensive” immigration laws?

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Liza Jeans January 10, 2011 at 6:49 pm: There are millions are illegal immigrants in the U.S. That’s not working. States have different laws from one another. We need to streamline all the laws and ENFORCE them, which means putting people who exploit illegal labor under the gun so to speak.

I don’t think illegals should receive any state or federal services, including public education.

I also don’t think being born in the country should automatically make you a citizen…so those are two laws that should be changed right there.

Adios!
hi January 10, 2011 at 7:45 pm: Because current law doesn’t mean amnesty, that’s their plan…
Evelyn j January 10, 2011 at 8:15 pm: the mexican border is proof alone that existing laws do not work and need reforming.

if existing laws work well and the the mexican border isnt such a big deal, then why did arizona feel the need to pass sb1070?
Proud Aryan January 10, 2011 at 8:59 pm: Good question. Ask Obama.
Jose Ole January 10, 2011 at 9:53 pm: you all should leave where you came from if you want to be that way

OUR EXISTING LAWS SEEM TO WORK WELL EXCEPT FOR THE MEXICAN BORDER SO WHY TALK ABOUT NEW COMPREHENSIVE?